knowledge-synthesis
Собрать единый ответ из результатов поиска
Что получите
Связный ответ с указанием источников, существенных противоречий и неопределённости.
Что передать
Вопрос и результаты поиска с источниками, датами и доступными сведениями об авторах.
Проверен состав файлов. Запуск не тестировался. Что проверено
Оценки пользователей
Как использовать
Помогает получить связный ответ из материалов разных корпоративных источников: переписки, документов и задач. Объединяет повторы, сохраняет уникальные детали и учитывает свежесть и авторитетность сведений.
- Передайте найденные материалы вместе с вопросом, на который нужно ответить.
- Попросите объединить повторяющиеся сведения по темам, сохранив разные мнения и изменения решений во времени.
- Выберите нужную глубину ответа; при большом объёме начните с основных выводов и уточните интересующую тему.
Условия работы
- Скилл используется как часть обработки результатов поиска и не предназначен для прямого вызова пользователем.
- Каждое утверждение должно опираться на источник. Противоречащие версии нельзя молча объединять или выбирать одну без пояснения.
- Устаревшие, неофициальные и слабо подтверждённые сведения нужно обозначать с соответствующей неопределённостью.
Пример запроса после установки
Собери ответ по найденным письмам, обсуждениям и документам: какое решение команда приняла о новом интерфейсе, когда его подтвердили и где источники расходятся?
Пример составлен по инструкции автора; результат запуска не проверялся.
Основание: инструкция закреплённой версииДля установки
Node.js, npm и Git для команды выше. Подключения и инструменты для работы скилла настраиваются отдельно.
Совместимые агенты
Совместимость указана для инструкций. Запуск в каждом приложении не тестировался; для веб-чата способ подключения может отличаться.
Файлы скилла
GitHubЧитать инструкцию SKILL.md
Исходный текст закреплённой версии.
---
name: knowledge-synthesis
description: Combines search results from multiple sources into coherent, deduplicated answers with source attribution. Handles confidence scoring based on freshness and authority, and summarizes large result sets effectively.
user-invocable: false
---
# Knowledge Synthesis
The last mile of enterprise search. Takes raw results from multiple sources and produces a coherent, trustworthy answer.
## The Goal
Transform this:
```
~~chat result: "Sarah said in #eng: 'let's go with REST, GraphQL is overkill for our use case'"
~~email result: "Subject: API Decision — Sarah's email confirming REST approach with rationale"
~~cloud storage result: "API Design Doc v3 — updated section 2 to reflect REST decision"
~~project tracker result: "Task: Finalize API approach — marked complete by Sarah"
```
Into this:
```
The team decided to go with REST over GraphQL for the API redesign. Sarah made the
call, noting that GraphQL was overkill for the current use case. This was discussed
in #engineering on Tuesday, confirmed via email Wednesday, and the design doc has
been updated to reflect the decision. The related ~~project tracker task is marked complete.
Sources:
- ~~chat: #engineering thread (Jan 14)
- ~~email: "API Decision" from Sarah (Jan 15)
- ~~cloud storage: "API Design Doc v3" (updated Jan 15)
- ~~project tracker: "Finalize API approach" (completed Jan 15)
```
## Deduplication
### Cross-Source Deduplication
The same information often appears in multiple places. Identify and merge duplicates:
**Signals that results are about the same thing:**
- Same or very similar text content
- Same author/sender
- Timestamps within a short window (same day or adjacent days)
- References to the same entity (project name, document, decision)
- One source references another ("as discussed in ~~chat", "per the email", "see the doc")
**How to merge:**
- Combine into a single narrative item
- Cite all sources where it appeared
- Use the most complete version as the primary text
- Add unique details from each source
### Deduplication Priority
When the same information exists in multiple sources, prefer:
```
1. The most complete version (fullest context)
2. The most authoritative source (official doc > chat)
3. The most recent version (latest update wins for evolving info)
```
### What NOT to Deduplicate
Keep as separate items when:
- The same topic is discussed but with different conclusions
- Different people express different viewpoints
- The information evolved meaningfully between sources (v1 vs v2 of a decision)
- Different time periods are represented
## Citation and Source Attribution
Every claim in the synthesized answer must be attributable to a source.
### Attribution Format
Inline for direct references:
```
Sarah confirmed the REST approach in her email on Wednesday.
The design doc was updated to reflect this (~~cloud storage: "API Design Doc v3").
```
Source list at the end for completeness:
```
Sources:
- ~~chat: #engineering discussion (Jan 14) — initial decision thread
- ~~email: "API Decision" from Sarah Chen (Jan 15) — formal confirmation
- ~~cloud storage: "API Design Doc v3" last modified Jan 15 — updated specification
```
### Attribution Rules
- Always name the source type (~~chat, ~~email, ~~cloud storage, etc.)
- Include the specific location (channel, folder, thread)
- Include the date or relative time
- Include the author when relevant
- Include document/thread titles when available
- For ~~chat, note the channel name
- For ~~email, note the subject line and sender
- For ~~cloud storage, note the document title
## Confidence Levels
Not all results are equally trustworthy. Assess confidence based on:
### Freshness
| Recency | Confidence impact |
|---------|------------------|
| Today / yesterday | High confidence for current state |
| This week | Good confidence |
| This month | Moderate — things may have changed |
| Older than a month | Lower confidence — flag as potentially outdated |
For status queries, heavily weight freshness. For policy/factual queries, freshness matters less.
### Authority
| Source type | Authority level |
|-------------|----------------|
| Official wiki / knowledge base | Highest — curated, maintained |
| Shared documents (final versions) | High — intentionally published |
| Email announcements | High — formal communication |
| Meeting notes | Moderate-high — may be incomplete |
| Chat messages (thread conclusions) | Moderate — informal but real-time |
| Chat messages (mid-thread) | Lower — may not reflect final position |
| Draft documents | Low — not finalized |
| Task comments | Contextual — depends on commenter |
### Expressing Confidence
When confidence is high (multiple fresh, authoritative sources agree):
```
The team decided to use REST for the API redesign. [direct statement]
```
When confidence is moderate (single source or somewhat dated):
```
Based on the discussion in #engineering last month, the team was leaning
toward REST for the API redesign. This may have evolved since then.
```
When confidence is low (old data, informal source, or conflicting signals):
```
I found a reference to an API migration discussion from three months ago
in ~~chat, but I couldn't find a formal decision document. The information
may be outdated. You might want to check with the team for current status.
```
### Conflicting Information
When sources disagree:
```
I found conflicting information about the API approach:
- The ~~chat discussion on Jan 10 suggested GraphQL
- But Sarah's email on Jan 15 confirmed REST
- The design doc (updated Jan 15) reflects REST
The most recent sources indicate REST was the final decision,
but the earlier ~~chat discussion explored GraphQL first.
```
Always surface conflicts rather than silently picking one version.
## Summarization Strategies
### For Small Result Sets (1-5 results)
Present each result with context. No summarization needed — give the user everything:
```
[Direct answer synthesized from results]
[Detail from source 1]
[Detail from source 2]
Sources: [full attribution]
```
### For Medium Result Sets (5-15 results)
Group by theme and summarize each group:
```
[Overall answer]
Theme 1: [summary of related results]
Theme 2: [summary of related results]
Key sources: [top 3-5 most relevant sources]
Full results: [count] items found across [sources]
```
### For Large Result Sets (15+ results)
Provide a high-level synthesis with the option to drill down:
```
[Overall answer based on most relevant results]
Summary:
- [Key finding 1] (supported by N sources)
- [Key finding 2] (supported by N sources)
- [Key finding 3] (supported by N sources)
Top sources:
- [Most authoritative/relevant source]
- [Second most relevant]
- [Third most relevant]
Found [total count] results across [source list].
Want me to dig deeper into any specific aspect?
```
### Summarization Rules
- Lead with the answer, not the search process
- Do not list raw results — synthesize them into narrative
- Group related items from different sources together
- Preserve important nuance and caveats
- Include enough detail that the user can decide whether to dig deeper
- Always offer to provide more detail if the result set was large
## Synthesis Workflow
```
[Raw results from all sources]
↓
[1. Deduplicate — merge same info from different sources]
↓
[2. Cluster — group related results by theme/topic]
↓
[3. Rank — order clusters and items by relevance to query]
↓
[4. Assess confidence — freshness × authority × agreement]
↓
[5. Synthesize — produce narrative answer with attribution]
↓
[6. Format — choose appropriate detail level for result count]
↓
[Coherent answer with sources]
```
## Anti-Patterns
**Do not:**
- List results source by source ("From ~~chat: ... From ~~email: ... From ~~cloud storage: ...")
- Include irrelevant results just because they matched a keyword
- Bury the answer under methodology explanation
- Present conflicting info without flagging the conflict
- Omit source attribution
- Present uncertain information with the same confidence as well-supported facts
- Summarize so aggressively that useful detail is lost
**Do:**
- Lead with the answer
- Group by topic, not by source
- Flag confidence levels when appropriate
- Surface conflicts explicitly
- Attribute all claims to sources
- Offer to go deeper when result sets are large
Проверка и особенности
Автоматическая проверка источника и файлов
Автоматически сверены публичный репозиторий, лицензия, YAML-заголовок SKILL.md, состав папки и Git-хеш каждого файла. Исполняемые файлы и срабатывания статических правил исключены из этой партии. Ручной аудит всех инструкций и проверка работы не проводились; эта проверка не гарантирует безопасность. Команда закреплена на проверенном коммите.
Интерес к репозиторию оцениваем по звёздам и форкам GitHub. Это показатели всего репозитория, а не числа установок отдельного скилла.
- Проверка состава
- 16.09.2026
- Проверенная версия
c55597c2697c- Файлы с кодом
- Не указаны в данных проверки
- Изменения на GitHub
- Нужна повторная проверкаПоследняя проверка: 11.10.2026
Репозиторий и лицензия
Это показатели всего репозитория, а не установки скилла. Снимок требует обновления.
- Последняя активность GitHub
- 11.10.2026
- Лицензия
- Apache-2.0
- Добавлен в каталог
- 16.09.2026
Полный текст лицензии
Apache License
Version 2.0, January 2004
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION
1. Definitions.
"License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction,
and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document.
"Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by
the copyright owner that is granting the License.
"Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all
other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common
control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition,
"control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the
outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.
"You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity
exercising permissions granted by this License.
"Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications,
including but not limited to software source code, documentation
source, and configuration files.
"Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical
transformation or translation of a Source form, including but
not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation,
and conversions to other media types.
"Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or
Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
(an example is provided in the Appendix below).
"Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications
represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes
of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain
separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of,
the Work and Derivative Works thereof.
"Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including
the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions
to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally
submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner
or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of
the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted"
means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent
to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to
communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems,
and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the
Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but
excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise
designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution."
"Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity
on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and
subsequently incorporated within the Work.
2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of,
publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the
Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form.
3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of
this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual,
worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable
(except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made,
use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work,
where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable
by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their
Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s)
with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You
institute patent litigation against any entity (including a
cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work
or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct
or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses
granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate
as of the date such litigation is filed.
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the
Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You
meet the following conditions:
(a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or
Derivative Works a copy of this License; and
(b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that You changed the files; and
(c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
attribution notices from the Source form of the Work,
excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of
the Derivative Works; and
(d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained
within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not
pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one
of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or
documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or,
within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and
wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents
of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and
do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution
notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside
or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided
that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed
as modifying the License.
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and
may provide additional or different license terms and conditions
for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or
for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use,
reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with
the conditions stated in this License.
5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise,
any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work
by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of
this License, without any additional terms or conditions.
Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify
the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
with Licensor regarding such Contributions.
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or
agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions
of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the
appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any
risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License.
8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory,
whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise,
unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly
negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be
liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special,
incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a
result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the
Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill,
work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all
other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor
has been advised of the possibility of such damages.
9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing
the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer,
and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity,
or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this
License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only
on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf
of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify,
defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability
incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason
of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability.
END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS
APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
identification within third-party archives.
Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
Ещё в этой категории
Все в категорииОбсуждение
ПравилаПользовались этим скиллом? Делитесь опытом без регистрации. Все комментарии проверяет модератор.
